a modern architecture firm

modern architecture blog

a blog about modern architecture, design, development + modative happenings
 
Loading

We post, you get an email. That's it.

Your email:

connect with modative

contact us

call modern architects

browse by tag

architecture blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

5 Things Architects Should Do Instead of Entering Open Competitions

 

Obviously, not everyone agrees with our last post "Why Architecture Competitions are Bad for Architects". A day after our post, archdaily, posted "Why open architecture competitions are good for Architects, a counter argument". 

The archdaily post, some blog comments, and a few twitter posts claim that our argument against competitions is an attack on creativity and passion within the architecture profession. This couldn't be further from the truth. A few questions to ponder:

Do open competitions have a monopoly on creativity?

Are competitions the only way to progress the architecture profession?

Absolutely not.

Open architecture competitions actually take much of the creativity out of what architects do. They provide everything: the site, program, objectives, and deadlines. Then they judge your work in private, without any back and forth collaboration.

It's comforting for architects to have all of this delivered to them. It's exactly how architecture school works. All the architect has to do is design in a bubble. I can certainly see the appeal.

Many architects will never be convinced that open competitions are bad for them and that's fine. But I would feel bad ripping on open competitions without providing some viable alternates. 

Architects will at some point inevitably find themselves with free time and/or needing a release from the daily grind. Instead of doing what architects have traditionally done (open competitions), consider one of these options instead:

1. Pro Bono Architecture

Pro bono work is more rewarding and has far more upside than an open architecture competition. And there are plenty of non-profit organizations that need an architect's help, but can't afford it. 

The 1% program website is a great starting point to learn about pro bono architecture and connect with with non-profits looking for architects. The 1% program asks that you donate at least 1% of your time to providing free or deeply discounted design work. In exchange, you get a rewarding experience working with people and building connections. Your work is also likely to be constructed and the publicity and experience you'll receive can lead to future paid commissions -often times in project types where you previously had no experience. 

2. A Design Intervention

This is how the 1% program got started. Public Architecture, a firm in San Francisco, decided that instead of entering another pointless competition, they would use that time and energy to improve their neighborhood through actual design interventions. They took an unused portion of the street and made it a temporary public park. The project was built with donated materials and labor. The neighborhood praised their efforts and the Mayor of San Francisco spoke at the project's opening. Now that's a great use of an architect's time.

mayor at architectur event

Mayor Newsome at the opening of Public Architecture's Pavement to Parks Project. Photo from Public Architecture's website.

Your Mayor doesn't give a shit about your open architecture competition entry.

A design intervention is essentially like doing your own competition. If you're going to do free work, you might as well do it for yourself and for something you're passionate about. Find a problem in your neighborhood, your city, and solve it. Get the community involved. Publish the process and the results, even if it never gets constructed.

3. Non-Architecture Projects

If you want a release, try out your design skills on something new. A few ideas:

Furniture - A coffee table for a modern lifestyle (laptops and ipads).

Building Materials - I have yet to see a building facade system that can be easily removed and recycled (like carpet tiles).

Products - Why let Karim Rashid have all the fun?

Karim Rashid Designs Stuff

Karim is laughing at you because you're letting him and Phillipe Stark design all the cool stuff. Photo by Roman Leo, New York

Textiles - There's a serious shortage of great modern rugs. I know, I've looked.

T-Shirts - A flooded market, but an easy one to get into nowadays.

4. Architect as Entrepreneur

Architects should be more entrepreneurial. We have some of the best problem solving skills around, yet we mostly wait for the phone to ring to get projects. We wait for the problem to come to us.

Imagine how much better our cities would look and function if more architects got involved in real estate development. Creating their own projects and developing them. Well, you don't have to imagine. Jonathan Segal, FAIA and Sebastian Mariscal have been doing this for years in San Diego with great success.

5. Go to a Bar

You are more likely to meet a stranger at a bar that will hire you to design them a real building than to win an actual architectural commission from an open competition. And even if you don't, you'll at least leave happy and having spent less money than you would on a competition.

 

If you have any additions to this list that you'd like to share, please add a comment.

Let's keep in touch - subscribe to this blog via email (top of right column) or RSS (for the techies).

Comments

Bravo! I admit that I had my doubts when I read the original post regarding not participating in open competitions but this follow up was superb. I have always believed that architecture is the originator of a community, that only through the interaction within a space do people begin to connect with the environment and with each other. Architects, as guardians of this phenomena need to work not only IN the community but FOR and WITH the community. You have offered some real options for Architects to reconnect and really affect their environments.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:26 AM by Ashley
Great argument, and very true about rugs :)
Posted @ Wednesday, June 02, 2010 12:10 PM by Yevgenia Watts
Great post! I love the idea of Architect as Entrepreneur. That's a much better place to put our energy. In fact, I used my last competition as an excuse to generate images for a speculative development for a client that's trying to get a project off the ground. If we win, that will just be a bonus.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 02, 2010 12:58 PM by Jody Brown
3. My new t-shirt business may be in jeopardy if I get a real job. 
 
4. In a couple years! You forgot Lloyd Russell, probably doing the best work out of the SD crew. 
http://www.lloyd-russell.com/ 
 
5. When is Office Hours again? You guys around for dwell on design? Ill be there. 
 
-Adam
Posted @ Wednesday, June 02, 2010 2:46 PM by Adam Mayberry
Right on Right on! Competitions are fun exercises but they are essentially narcissistic and futile endeavors. But hmmmm...on the other hand i think i might start a competition among Doctors to see who can operate on my knee for free......
Posted @ Wednesday, June 02, 2010 3:41 PM by Mike Benz
I fully support reason No. 5. 
 
Suggest No. 6........Let a bloodsucker drain whatever blood you have left after submitting your proposal.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 02, 2010 8:13 PM by Steve Nicholson
This is a really positive uses of our creative talents that will generate actual results. Competitions rarely ever do that. Thanks
Posted @ Thursday, June 03, 2010 7:36 AM by Michael Salt
I think one of the primary reasons why the profession (design or design/build) has evolved to this state is because the paying customers out there in the world (meaning every one except architects) are woefully undereducated about "design process". Which is why we always attempt to have our clients participate in as much of the process as possible and not just see our design "presentations". Believe it or not most people outside of a creative profession actually think that good design or art is usually the result of a 'genius' having a eureka moment in the shower. They are blissfully unaware of the long, hard "process of discovery" that is an integral part of the effort in ANY creative manifestation. This ignorance is a root reason behind many issues - lower fees, misunderstanding a solution, design competitions, etc - and it is the why there is such a gulf of understanding between clients and architects, even if the relationship is a successful one. Add to this the new cultural phenomena of every one wanting it all and wanting it "NOW" and the situation is exasperated to a level of dysfunction. I also feel that we architects are probably the most to blame for this situation.  
Another more subtle and intangible reason is that of all the professions out there ours (Architecture) is the one and only one that every single person in the world seems to think they could have pursued. I don't know why that is but they do. Maybe it is because it is perceived as being "not quite science" and "not quite art" so every one thinks they could have been one. This may seem funny but i really think it is one of the reasons why our services are some times viewed as a "necessary evil" instead of the lofty status we wish it had. Now, not all clients and people feel this way obviously or we wouldn't have some of the great work we do see out there. But I have always said that good design products are as much a tribute to the client as they are to the creator.
Posted @ Thursday, June 03, 2010 2:38 PM by Mike benz
Innovation in design normally takes place in respose to the ego of the client, a subsidy to economic reality or a lack of budget.
Posted @ Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:45 PM by Steve Nicholson
I completely agreed on the first article. And for sure I support the idea on helping improve our communities, that going into a competition, where the judges probably now in advanced who is going to win ( this happens in Costa Rica allll the time). Sometimes people don't like when some other talks about the truth. Keep on posting your inconvenient truths. 
And just a month ago, I met a client at the gym: my spinning teacher, yeah!!!
Posted @ Thursday, June 03, 2010 6:06 PM by Gloriana Mejia
Thanks for the comments. Some responses... 
 
Ashley - Glad to see you're coming around. 
 
Yevgenia - Shopping for modern rugs is torture. 
 
Jody - My friend, we are on the same page on so many issues in our industry. 
 
Adam - Good call on Lloyd Russell, but is he a developer? I may head over to Dwell for a day, but only if you bring me a free Mayberry t-shirt. 
 
Jason - Great website. Thanks for posting. I'll look into this further. 
 
Mike B (part 1)- I'll ask the doctors I know if they're interested in your knee operation competition. 
 
Uncle Steve - I'll see you at the bar. 
 
Michael - Right on - It generates results and breaks us out of our little architecture world. 
 
Cindy - Design/build is a big topic in our office this year. I'll have to address this further in a future post. 
 
Mike B (part 2) - This is such a thoughtful and honest comment that it should be its own blog post. I'll contact you in the coming weeks about a guest post? 
 
Uncle Steve (part 2) - We always think that our most creative moments are responses to constraints - most often of the budgetary nature. 
 
Gloriana - I like that - "inconvenient truths". Pura Vida! 
 
-Derek
Posted @ Saturday, June 05, 2010 5:06 PM by Derek Leavitt
Derek, 
 
Lloyd is definitely a developer. He did The Merimac and The Essex in Little Italy with Ted Smith. Then did R-3 on his own where he lives now. For being a small piece of property and especially a SFR, there is more thought put into It than any town built. He is also the only one building in SD right now, his property in Hillcrest is sure to win awards based in his approach of creating unique living environment.  
 
Posted @ Sunday, June 06, 2010 1:28 AM by Adam
Derek, 
I couldn't agree more. As an ex-bartender for years at a high-end restaurant, I would especially recommend #5. I developed some great connections, paying clients and even got my current job on a recommendation from a patron, now client. 
One thing I have done in my free time, instead of competitions, is design for vacant or under utilized land in my city. I find that a client is more likely to connect with a place they are familiar with, as opposed to a housing competition in China. Also, it pays the same as a competition, but you are not restricted to the use or typology of the facility.
Posted @ Saturday, June 12, 2010 9:17 AM by jonathan morschl
Competitions are for architects with balls!  
 
Complaining does not make up for the lack of commitment, persistence and passion! 
 
All the points above are valid, everyone chooses their own path in architecture. 
 
Some of the most talented architects have emerged from competitions! Great architects have arisen from competitions. 
 
If you can’t stand sleeping 4 hours a day for a month and then gradually 1 hour a day and down to no sleep for 3 or 4 days to meet the deadline, then don’t even enter a competition. 
 
Architecture becomes airhead-ecture when you do it for the money. 
 
Posted @ Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:30 PM by AS
Architects with balls and ovaries are not defined by not sleeping at all in a month.That is old school. They are defined by their good energy and passion that attracts new businesses every day, profit or nonprofit. Talented architects of today have new ways to emerge ( even if it's at a bar or gym!) and I believe Modative's point of view defines a great architecture path as someone winning a competition.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:41 PM by Gloriana Mejia
AS, 
 
You're entitled to your opinion. In fact I encourage you to go down this "route to fame" that you seek. Ignore the real world around you. Swear off any financial gain from the skills you've worked so hard to aquire. Hide out in the basement playing around on Maya, Rhino, or whatever architectural software-de-joir you fancy for 20 hours a day. Make cool objects on your screen and present them to other architects for judgment. If you don't win, repeat. Then repeat again. Keep doing this until you realize that there are other options. 
 
It's too bad because you seem to have the energy required to do some real good. To make real buildings for real people. To break out of the "I'm hard core cause I don't ever sleep" architecture crowd. To resist the urge to try to get famous the same way architects got famous in the 1970's. 
 
-Derek... 
 
PS - Thanks Gloriana
Posted @ Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:49 PM by Derek Leavitt
Couldn't have said it better myself Derek!.....and this is coming from some one who has probably missed more hours of sleep then AS has slept! Not that I am proud of it but those missed hours of sleep were from working on actual projects that were eventually built! You don't need to do a competition to earn that pathetic badge!
Posted @ Wednesday, June 16, 2010 1:41 PM by Mike Benz
Derek I respect your point of view and the way you wish to operate within the profession; however I disagree with you regarding competitions. 
 
 
 
There is no subsitute for hard work. 
 
I use software as a tool, there is no subsitute for the human spirit. 
 
And, at the risk of sounding arrogant- I have been honored by awards and my team and I have won international competitions.  
 
One can study why teams win competitions and there is only one option- HARD WORK. 
 
Lazy formalistic manupilation and shallow software experimentation delivers objects not architecture. 
 
Without intense research and a rigourous methodology, architecture is non-existent. 
 
Being famous is not the goal- creating ethical strategies for society is the purpose.  
 
This applies whether one is designing for a competition, urban plan, multi-use complex, house, shelter or any strategy be it for a NGO or for a for profit organization. 
 
Without this discipline one is an air-chitect, or worse a permit processing whore that destroys not only architecture but most importantly society. 
 
 
 
Now, tell me that ethical architecture does not require time... 
 
 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:04 PM by AS
AS, not sure why you're preaching to anyone about hard work. Just because this post recommends 5 other things to do besides entering open competitions, it doesn't mean get fat in lazy on physical work or design. So you think the 5 items that Derek has mentioned as alternatives requires less work than entering a competition?
Posted @ Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:17 PM by jason
AS, 
I don't believe this is what you are intending to impart with your comments. However, because your comments are rather hyperbolic in nature they come across as though you are saying "any one who has ever designed something that was built is a buffoon or a whore (as u so elegantly put it) who does not work hard or is undisciplined in their approach". That is not the case at all. Producing good architecture on paper or in reality requires all those "ethical" attributes you are so proud of, and it requires them in much more abundance than competition work does. There are many firms of both stripes (disciplined and undisciplined) who practice architecture as there are many of both who enter competitions. I have won awards for both paper architecture and for built architecture and i can tell you this - the awards for the built work have been much more satisfying. And do you know why? It's not born of a snobbish arrogance toward paper architecture because I have a real appreciation for all good design. It's more satisfying because frankly it requires MORE discipline and is MUCH HARDER work then competition architecture. Any one who has done a fair amount of both would attest to this. If i were "lazy" and could make a living at doing nothing but competitions - then that is what I would do. So your insinuation that architects who are out there producing work that is actually experienced by people and improves their lives are "lazy...whores" is one of the more insulting things i have ever heard. But maybe I misinterpret........
Posted @ Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:05 PM by Mike Benz
AS,  
 
Where u at? Too busy pulling an ethical all-nighter in your morally disciplined and hard working bubble? Cause I'm heading home early at 10:30 pm after lazily whoring myself in preparing for a presentation at 7am to some one who is going to actually spend a few million dollars of their own money on our teams idea's for an almost net zero energy headquarter building. But since it will actually be built its Airhead-itecture or whatever! .... You want to talk about balls? You know who has the balls? Its not you or I because we spend alot of sleepless nights in pursuit of our narcissistic visions of what we think is right and "moral". Its the person who puts his faith in us by borrowing millions of dollars to build that "vision". In some quarters they are known as a "client". Which is probably a very quaint term to you. But do you have the "balls" to put your financial livelihood on the line to realize your evident genius? Because i myself have not, but my clients have - so therefore they are the ones with the "balls" my friend,.... and they didnt spend any of the all nighters with me.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 16, 2010 10:41 PM by Mike Benz
Sorry about my unprofessionalism Derek. But i was just seeing red and couldn't filter myself. It won't happen again.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:26 PM by Mike Benz
I just spent a month on the Kaohsiung competition... 
These 5 alternatives seem very appealing!
Posted @ Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:41 PM by rob smith
Derek, 
I have one other option to share that could lead to business development opportunities: community board service. It is by no means glamorous, and is of course pro bono but the experience has opened my eyes (widely) to the process of land development in the public realm. As a result of the time I have devoted to community board service in my neck of the woods I have had the opportunity to 1) connect with local politicians, business people and cultural organizations, 2) to participate in the design review for a large waterfront development and 3) have facilitated (at long last) the construction of a much needed playground for our local public, where my son has attended.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:02 PM by Robert Wilkanowski
Couldnt agree more with you on those 5 things... nice article.. maybe i will find another stranger who wants to hire me or maybe someone here needs some help with their sketchup models?
Posted @ Thursday, December 23, 2010 12:05 AM by salman
Open competitions are useful for getting your portfolio out, putting your studio working and testing your response capacity. If you do not have clients, at least you can show new clients the projects you have done in the competitions. 
 
But once you have made several competitions and won none...things get a little bit more dificult. You start to wonder why are you doing this? Is this realy the only way of acheiving something? 
 
Not to mention that finantialy is absolutely impossible to maintain an office based on this... 
 
I found the 1% project very interesting! 
 
Best Regards and good luck for all! 
 
Posted @ Tuesday, August 30, 2011 6:13 AM by Joao Saraiva Mendes
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics